Loading policy data...
4 positions on record
A candidate's general stance on regulating AI systems.
Said AI is "something that we're trying to keep a rein on... but the problem with AI is that we're holding onto the tail" and "it's just advancing so quick - we pass some, but by the time we pass it ,we need to pass more"
Source: Statement · wave3.com
Views on protecting minors from harms related to AI or AI-mediated platforms.
Talked about children being extorted on a Fox 59 channel, but no clear policy position has made
Source: Statement · facebook.com
Views on AI-generated misinformation, scam prevention, fraud targeting vulnerable populations, and synthetic media disclosure requirements.
After Haggard's wife was targeted in AI deepfake, Haggard said that he would fight to let people know that this is a serious thing and we need to continue to fight to protect folks; introduced a bill that would modify state law to match the federal 'Take It Down Act' and makes the penalties for creating and distributing AI porn in Indiana similar to the penalties at the federal level — up to three years in prison and fines
Source: Statement · facebook.com
Stance on federal preemption of state AI laws, states' rights to regulate AI, and the patchwork of local vs. national regulatory approaches.
Haggard explicitly said he doesn't like the threat of pulling funding from states with AI laws, and anticipates Indiana's state-level protections will remain on the books, though he doesn't state it as a hard policy position
Source: Statement · wane.com
Last updated Jun 9, 2026
Methodology