David Cheston Rouzer

AI Regulation Philosophy

A candidate's general stance on regulating AI systems.

Notes that the focus remains on reducing regulatory barriers to ensure that American innovation continues to lead the way

Source: Statement · rouzer.house.gov

Data Centers

Positions on the development, regulation, or public impact of data center infrastructure as it relates to AI, including energy consumption and grid reliability concerns tied to AI workloads.

Signed a letter to the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy urging the Administration to incorporate silicon carbide into the AI Action Plan; a part of the effort to reduce AI's growing energy footprint with advanced semiconductor tech

Source: Statement · hudson.house.gov

Jobs and Workforce Disruption

Positions on AI-driven job displacement, reskilling programs, unemployment policy, and tax policy for distributing AI-driven wealth.

Believes that the U.S. must support AI literacy and technical skills to advance the workforce

Source: Statement · youtube.com

AI Preemption

Stance on federal preemption of state AI laws, states' rights to regulate AI, and the patchwork of local vs. national regulatory approaches.

Asked Michael Kratsio if the lack of federal preemption is among the top three hurdles to innovation

Source: Statement · youtube.com