Map
About
Submit Correction

Loading policy data...

AI on the Ballot

Nonpartisan research tracking where U.S. Congressional candidates in the 2026 midterm elections stand on artificial intelligence policy.

Navigate

About Methodology Corrections Contact

A project of Evitable

@v1naya

David P. Huebner | AI on the Ballot

←Back to Nebraska

David P. Huebner

U.S. House · Nebraska

Export Control and Compute GovernanceNo mention

Military and National Security Uses of AINo mention

AI Regulation PhilosophyNo mention

AI Companion ChatbotsNo mention

Children's Online SafetyNo mention

Data CentersMixed

Jobs and Workforce DisruptionSupport

Deepfakes and AI FraudNo mention

AI PreemptionNo mention

Intellectual Property and AINo mention

2 positions on record

Hide "No Mention" entries

Data Centers

Positions on the development, regulation, or public impact of data center infrastructure as it relates to AI, including energy consumption and grid reliability concerns tied to AI workloads.

MixedMedium

Supports data centers in Nebraska only if companies bring strong deals like local jobs, actual tech development, American ownership, no tax incentives; opposes "empty buildings full of servers controlled from out of state"

Source: Statement · facebook.com

Jobs and Workforce Disruption

Positions on AI-driven job displacement, reskilling programs, unemployment policy, and tax policy for distributing AI-driven wealth.

SupportMedium

Insists tech companies investing in Nebraska commit to local job creation and tech development, not just passive infrastructure; wants workforce benefit as a condition of investment

Source: Statement · facebook.com

See an error? If candidate information is out of date or incorrectly coded, you can submit a correction for review.

Submit a correction Candidate clarification form

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

Methodology