Loading policy data...
4 positions on record
Government control or restriction of advanced AI capabilities through trade, export, or compute access.
Believes in improving export controls on sensitive technologies so China can't buy or steal criticial capabilities
Source: Statement · chicago.suntimes.com
A candidate's general stance on regulating AI systems.
Champions 'balanced, commonsense approach to AI that encourages innovation...strengthens American competitiveness' but opposes overregulation; emphasizes avoiding massive new bureaucracies/regulatory schemes
Positions on the development, regulation, or public impact of data center infrastructure as it relates to AI, including energy consumption and grid reliability concerns tied to AI workloads.
Says if data centers are going to expand in Illinois, they must pay their fair share for infrastructure and energy demand; opposed to policy that drives up cost; argues that infrastructure needs to grow in order to support innovation, strengthen national security, and compete with China
Source: Statement · sj-r.com
Views on AI-generated misinformation, scam prevention, fraud targeting vulnerable populations, and synthetic media disclosure requirements.
Says Congress should prevent AI from being used for fraud and surveillance abuse.
Last updated Jun 9, 2026
Methodology