Donna Miller

Export Control and Compute Governance

Government control or restriction of advanced AI capabilities through trade, export, or compute access.

Writes that export conrols on advanced AI chips are critical to ensure that AI is developed in America for the benefit of Americans

Source: Statement · donnaforcongress.com

AI Regulation Philosophy

A candidate's general stance on regulating AI systems.

Asserts that AI has the potential to change our day-to-day lives which means we need strong and thoughtful federal regulation

Source: Statement · donnaforcongress.com

AI Companion Chatbots

Positions on AI systems designed for emotional, relational, or social interaction.

Argues that there must be strict regulation as it pertains to the safety of kids, teens, and vulnerable populations, ensuring chatbots and other AI tools are built with safety top of mind.

Source: Statement · donnaforcongress.com

Children's Online Safety

Views on protecting minors from harms related to AI or AI-mediated platforms.

Argues that there must be strict regulation as it pertains to the safety of kids, teens, and vulnerable populations, ensuring chatbots and other AI tools are built with safety top of mind.

Source: Statement · donnaforcongress.com

Jobs and Workforce Disruption

Positions on AI-driven job displacement, reskilling programs, unemployment policy, and tax policy for distributing AI-driven wealth.

Says that AI groups should work hand in hand with labor leaders to ensure the work force and our economy handles AI integration to the benefit of working class Americans, not just corporations and billionaires

Source: Statement · donnaforcongress.com

AI Preemption

Stance on federal preemption of state AI laws, states' rights to regulate AI, and the patchwork of local vs. national regulatory approaches.

Writes that in the absence of a robust federal framework, states should be able to regulate AI based on the needs of their communities

Source: Statement · donnaforcongress.com