Map
About
Submit Correction

Loading policy data...

AI on the Ballot

Nonpartisan research tracking where U.S. Congressional candidates in the 2026 midterm elections stand on artificial intelligence policy.

Navigate

About Methodology Corrections Contact

A project of Evitable

@v1naya

Mark Cohen | AI on the Ballot

←Back to Nebraska

Mark Cohen

U.S. House · Nebraska

Export Control and Compute GovernanceNo mention

Military and National Security Uses of AINo mention

AI Regulation PhilosophySupport

AI Companion ChatbotsNo mention

Children's Online SafetyNo mention

Data CentersMixed

Jobs and Workforce DisruptionNo mention

Deepfakes and AI FraudNo mention

AI PreemptionNo mention

Intellectual Property and AINo mention

2 positions on record

Hide "No Mention" entries

AI Regulation Philosophy

A candidate's general stance on regulating AI systems.

SupportMedium

Supports federal legislation to regulate data centers and AI-driven privacy threats; cites constitutional right to privacy being eroded by AI and corporate data collection; supports GRID Act, Data Center Transparency Act, Shield Act, and PRICE Act

Source: Statement · markfornebraska.org

Data Centers

Positions on the development, regulation, or public impact of data center infrastructure as it relates to AI, including energy consumption and grid reliability concerns tied to AI workloads.

MixedHigh

Does not oppose data centers but opposes "giving away Nebraska's most precious resource"; wants mandatory water-efficient cooling technology; warns of bubble risk and extractive economic model leaving Nebraska with depleted aquifer and stranded grid; supports federal legislation requiring data centers to find independent power sources and reach 100% clean energy by 2040

Source: Statement · markfornebraska.org

See an error? If candidate information is out of date or incorrectly coded, you can submit a correction for review.

Submit a correction Candidate clarification form

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

Methodology